

- #LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR UPDATE#
- #LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR MANUAL#
- #LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR SOFTWARE#
I'm not aware of a single solution to all this - probably because each project is so different. Now by redefining the view to SELECT * FROM main_table_$newid we can atomically swicth the table. DELETE FROM history_table WHERE superseded_id>=įor databases, where performance is a problem, we do this in a secondary database on a different server, then copy the found-to-be-good main table to the production database into a new table main_table_$id with $id being the highest import id and have main_table be a trivial view to SELECT * FROM main_table_$someid.REPLACE INTO main_table SELECT FROM history table WHERE superseded_id=.Find out the import_id of the bad import.Every DELETE moves the row to the history table.
#LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR UPDATE#
#LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR MANUAL#
( issue might come from manual data entry error, ETL failure.) Data can occasionally be unavailable or incomplete or inconsistent. I have an unreliable datasource of product catalog. Let's take an example with only 1 table to make it easier. If you are already in this case, the best is to restore your 24 words seed on Multibit HD or Mycelium and empty your wallet (and stop receiving dust payments).I am looking for pattern, framework or best practice to handle a generic problem of application level data synchronisation. Not only it will take a few hours, but you have risks that it will not manage to do it (the chip may get too hot and fault some computation etc). If you want to make a payment of 1 BTC then the chip will have to construct a transaction of 1,000 inputs and sign 1,000 times.

Imagine that you have received 1,000 payments of 0.001 BTC. The reason is that the chip must sign all inputs when you want to make an outgoing transaction.
#LEDGER LIVE SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR SOFTWARE#
Set the payment threshold at a higher level (for instance 0.05 BTC), or use an temporary software based wallet which you'll empty every 0.05 BTC. This kind of incoming payments are typical of mining pools or faucets. It is not recommended to receive small payments (also called dust payments) on a hardware wallet. It's not a good idea to mine small amounts to the Ledger, here's an comment from the Ledger Knowledge Base:Ĭan I use a hardware wallet as a direct payou from a mining pool or a faucet?
